The UN’s Master Plan to Destroy US Sovereignty and Establish Global Governance

Their whole agenda laid bare...

To whom it may concern,

The United Nations has become – if they haven’t been from the very beginning – a tyrannical organization that seeks to use the façade of peace to advance their global governance agenda.

Despite this provable fact, a poll of nearly two thousand registered voters in August 2023 showed that 73% of respondents – roughly two-thirds of Republicans and 86% of Democrats from across the political spectrum – support America’s engagement with the United Nations (UN). UN favorability stood at 52%, with a plurality of Republicans saying they view the UN in a positive light. More than half of all voters support paying full dues to the UN’s regular budget, and an even greater percentage (nearly 60%) are in favor of paying dues to the UN’s peacekeeping budget. These numbers reflect similar nationwide data – including a 2023 survey by Pew Research – noting “strong UN favorability among Americans.”

I’ve been doing research on how the UN has been scheming to take down America’s national sovereignty for about 4 years now, and it’s alarming how many people in our country don’t understand that this is the real goal of the United Nations. My hope is that the research I share with you here will help legislators and their teams to expose the UN’s intentions, who they’re working with in our own government to dismantle us from within, and highlight how America’s hard-earned tax-payer dollars are being used to do it. If you are a citizen reading this, please share this document with your representatives in Congress and locally.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Lisa

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 1: The UN’s Anti-American Brainwashing Operation

-UNESCO’S Social Emotional Learning (education), the Collaborative for Spirituality in Education (based on UN documents), and the rise of Whole Child Design & the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model of Education (A.K.A. “Community Schools”)

-the Inner Development Goals (businesses and governments), the NOAA’s involvement

-Sensitivity Training in the Military (also used in SEL and IDGs, DEI trainings)

Section 2: The UN’s Cult Ideology (Cosmological Monism) and the Evolutionary Leaders—the ACTUAL CULT of NGOs running things at the UN

-the Evolutionary Leaders’ role in guiding the 2024 Summit of the Future’s impact document (Pact for the Future) through their Deep and Rapid Transformation Convergence (DRTC) group

Section 3: The U.S-U.N. Education Conspiracy (UNESCO’s Education for All conferences), and the FRESH Partnership behind “Whole Child Education”

-The SoLD (Science of Learning and Development Alliance) behind the Whole Child Design Principles

-GSoLEN (Global Science of Learning Education Network) and AERA

Section 4: The “Resilience” Agenda

-The Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (secretly the WHO’s Geneva Charter for Well-Being)

-RESILIENCE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: the 2030-2050 UN Sustainable Development Goal agenda

-FEMA’s National Resilience Guidance

Section 5: ESG and the Social Credit System to Come

-Intro to ESG

-the Sustainable Stock Exchange

-the UN Global Compact

-BSR and the Partnership for LGBTQIA+ Equality (using UN metrics to report “inclusive practices”

-ESG + SEL =Social Credit System, hiring based on “Emotional Intelligence”

-ESG + R (Resilience) is the next step

Section 6: Americorps and the Better Together America Ecosystem

-indoctrination through their training programs

-politically-motivated assignments (misuse of federal funds)

-Student Success Coaches (fast track to becoming teachers) & grave concerns about vetting process

-ClimateCorps

-Better Together America Ecosystem partners pushing progressive policies under the guise of interfaith, civic dialogue, “democracy”

Section 7: THE END GOAL-A Digital ID on the Blockchain and Interconnected Systems of Data

-the World Bank Blockchain in Education Working Group

-the Internet of Education (Learning Economy Foundation)

Section 8: Possible Solutions

-Data Privacy (Data drives EVERYTHING)

-Do away with PPPs/unelected arm of government

-Return things mostly local, not global

-Investigate communist activity in tax-exempt foundations and our own federal government

---

The United Nations has been basically using a two-pronged approach to accomplish their goal of global governance in the United States:

1.      To infiltrate all of the main cultural institutions (education, government, religion, etc.) to ultimately destroy the most sacred cultural influence of all- the family. It is the family (and its ability to impress upon future generations its individualistic values, attitudes, and beliefs) that the UN has acknowledged as its BIGGEST obstacle to mobilizing enough people to adopt the collectivist mindsets that would make them advocates for their Sustainable Development Goals.

2.      Using the financial power of the private sector (businesses, philanthropy, etc.), civil society, and unconstitutional public-private partnerships to make prong #1 above happen at scale as an unnatural force of culture change.

Section 1: The UN’s Anti-American Brainwashing Operation

The meat of what my research proves is that the United Nations has had active, anti-American brainwashing operations going on in various sectors of the US for a while now:

·         Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in K-12 education (which will soon become the Compassionate Systems Awareness framework, covered here, which seeks to develop “deep thinking…around the UN SDGs). The UN agency UNESCO openly admits in this document that Social Emotional Learning (SEL) taught in K-12 schools is necessary to advance their Sustainable Development Agenda. The idea is to manipulate students' empathy to get them to believe that every individual has a responsibility to the Sustainable Development Goals through the concept of “global citizenship,” which doesn’t exist unless we were to do away with national sovereignty (See Idea 824 from former Assistant Secretary General Robert Muller), and have a global sovereign (i.e. the United Nations) instituting global governance over all nations. While the Fetzer Institute’s documents I found in their archive have proven that the aim of inserting social emotional learning in schools was always subversively religious in nature (to cultivate a global spiritual transformation), there is also now an explicit effort by them to infuse “spirituality” as a type of civics into social emotional learning through the Collaborative for Spirituality in Education. The ultimate goal of the people and organizations involved with this—the Fetzer Institute, Teacher’s College at Columbia University, and Steven Rockefeller—is to teach “shared global ethics” through SEL, but those shared ethics are based upon their warped interpretation of the Declaration of Independence (which they twist to mean INTER-dependence- see bottom of page 3), the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), and the Earth Charter. All three of these documents are pushing the same religious dogma that “all is one” (cosmological monism- the UN's cult ideology - see below). This worldview advocates for socialism/communism vs. free enterprise, and preaches that individualism—a largely American value—is selfish. This article I wrote for The Federalist goes into how state-sponsored SEL violates the 1st amendment of the U.S. Constitution in its attempt to infuse the religious science of ‘right human relations’ into education while cloaking it in secular language. The “spirituality” they intend to impart to children as a fundamental “right” (a la the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child) in order to meet the "needs of the whole child," (see this X thread for the bills funding this) is a wide acceptance of sexual variance and the offering of an alternative belief system that differs from that of their family, culture, and religion. While SEL has enjoyed bipartisan support, I suspect Republicans especially have been cunningly fooled into thinking that this educational initiative will be an aid to solve the country’s mental health crisis. In fact, this challenging of foundational beliefs and the sexualization that is happening through it is causing disassociation in children, and has likely been one of the root causes of the trauma contributing to the mental health crisis and the rise in transgender-identifying youth. The sensitivity training methodology used by SEL programs to encourage dialogue, (i.e. circle times where they ask students to answer open-ended questions like “What makes you sad?”), can be extremely triggering to kids who have experienced trauma, and teachers, who are unwittingly practicing experimental group therapy without a license, are unable to know what to do to handle these types of situations. Look at the rest of the videos in this X thread of brave psychologist Dr. Laura Sanger, as she calls for other psychotherapists to join her in exposing how SEL can be harmful to children. Check out the last question on this list from the SEL standard-bearer CASEL to see how these circle times can also be used to introduce students to how they can play a role in social justice activism. The next step of the UN’s agenda is to use SEL and mental health as an entry point to offer even more services at school and literally turn schools into mini-hospitals through the CDC’s WSCC (Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child) model. NEA president Becky Pringle describes this at the United Nations’ Transforming Education Summit as “community schools,” which is another name this agenda goes by to make it sound less threatening. This effort is currently being spearheaded by the people and organizations behind the Whole Child Design Principles (see X thread on this here). Community schools will allow children to access medical services that are typically facilitated by parents and offered outside of school while they’re at school (even sexual and reproductive health—including access to “morning after pills” and puberty blockers, vaccines, mental health counseling, spiritual guidance, etc.). The end goal is to eventually pass bills to remove parental consent for said services, so that youth can decide for themselves (as a “right”) that they need/want these interventions. See this interview that fellow mom and researcher Kelly Schenkoske did with Moms for Liberty’s Tiffany Justice for the full scoop on WSCC. To learn more about the Whole Child Design Model and how it will make it a requirement for anyone in the community who interacts with children through the services they access to learn critical theories under the guise of “culturally-responsive teaching,” watch my longer video on it here, look at my X thread, or check out the article I wrote on my Substack.

·         In the business sector, organizational development/management training was previously used for similar aims as SEL, but currently things are moving towards a newer version called the Inner Development Goals (IDGs). These are 23 skills across 5 domains (virtually identical to SEL’s 5 core competencies) that individuals are supposed to cultivate in order to feel personally responsible for the fulfillment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The plan is for this framework to become part of professional development/required training across organizations for all their employees. Some universities have already made the Inner Development Goals a part of their core curriculum (especially for students getting degrees in business, entrepreneurship and management) and some businesses, like IKEA, Google, and Spotify have adopted training in the IDGs organization-wide.  According to their COO in the previous hyperlink, Apple is also in talks with the IDG people to put this into every iPhone. UN agencies (like UNDP, and OECD) are also heavily involved in this initiative, and at 7:37-11:15 in this recording, you can hear that explicitly stated. I’ve done a thread on X with some supporting evidence touching on this here, and the last post links to the longer, more detailed video explaining it here. A complete stranger saw my X thread, researched the topic, and wrote his own article about it, which you can find here.

·         In government, the same “sensitivity training”/encounter groups/T-Group methods utilized in Social Emotional Learning, “human relations” training in organizational development, and the recent Inner Development Goals, have been being used in the military for quite some time. In this CIA document I found from 1974, a psychologist compared this type of training (which was being used with spies going into the field to help them not defect or get brainwashed by the enemy, and also DEI trainings) to Maoist-style brainwashing. It is quite literally behavioral psychotherapy using trauma bonding techniques. The doctor pointed out that “intensively emotionally-involving group experience of any sort sets into motion a set of group dynamics that destroys objective individual judgment” and discouraged its continued use. Yet, it is still being utilized today through SEL’s “circle times,” professional development trainings in DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), and most recently, the IDGs. I can only assume that it is still being used in the military in the US and elsewhere, and it’s slated for even wider use in many countries’ leadership. Costa Rica and at least 5 other governments have already partnered with the IDGs to embed the Inner Development Goals into their national policies, and the IDGs boast that 25 other governments are interested in partnering with them in some way, shape, or form, including the U.S. Recently, the U.S. government, particularly the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association) has partnered with the Inner Development Goals to use their trainings for members of the government, and have openly said they plan to use it in K-12 schools for Climate Literacy education through the Next Generation Science Standards. I’m guessing that this will also include their use in shaping the mindsets and beliefs of the newly created Climate Corps – discussed below – as well). Besides that, there is a network of over 250+ IDG Hubs across the U.S. and the world that operate as a self-organized emerging ecosystem of practitioners, executives, scientists, employees, consultants, researchers, teachers, and students who are working collectively to put the IDG framework into action wherever they’re located. The Club of Rome (CoR) recently commissioned the Inner Development Goal folks to write a paper on how their framework could be implemented into their Earth4All initiative, a 50-year follow up to their Limits to Growth report. The Club of Rome is actively scheming along with the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (WEF) to move all economies into deceptively termed “well-being societies” and they realize that mindset plays a big role in the people in those societies accepting this shift (which is really a shift into communofascism), without rising up in revolution.

It’s critical that those in power understand (and many of us have the receipts to prove the collusion), that the CoR’s Earth4All initiative IS the WEF’s Great Reset IS the UN Sustainable Development Goals IS the European Union’s NextGenerationEU IS the WHO’s Geneva Charter for Well-Being IS the Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (which I go over below). They are all part of the same conspiracy to take over the West and depopulate the planet using different names though they are driven by the same cult ideology.

Section 2: The UN’s Cult Ideology (Cosmological Monism) and the Evolutionary Leaders—the ACTUAL CULT of NGOs running things at the UN

Both SEL and the IDGs are pushing a one world religion through the ideology of cosmological monism, a New Age belief couched in ancient eastern mystical religion that all things – God, humans, animals, the earth and its biosphere – come from the same Omega Point; that we are all interconnected and more importantly interdependent. This is a very different religious worldview than the theistic faiths of Judaism and Christianity. The folks behind the brainwashing efforts of SEL and the IDGs, which advocate for adopting this collectivist worldview believe that if enough people come to a global consciousness of this fact that we are indeed one and the same with God and all things, that it will bring the cooperation needed to bring about the next stage in human evolution. 

There is quite literally a religious cult behind these ideas called the Evolutionary Leaders, chock full of members from various United Nations NGOs like those involved at the Committee on Spirituality, Values and Global Concerns including National Ethical Service, the American Ethical Union, the United Religions Initiative, and more. These orgs, many of which have come from the Values Caucus and Earth Caucus, all have consultative status at the United Nations, and comprise one of several Major NGO groups that advised the UN on what “global ethics” to include in the Pact for the Future, the outcome document that was just adopted at their Summit of the Future on September 22, 2024. The Evolutionary Leaders have formed the SDG Thought Leaders Circle and the Unitive Cluster for these purposes and have recruited other NGOs to be a part of their newly formed Deep and Rapid Transformation Convergence (DRTC) at the UN. They have a group already formed to coordinate follow-through on their ideas in “Phase 3” after the Summit is over. (See this X thread for how the DRTC infused their “Unitive Narrative lens” into the Pact for the Future). It’s important to understand that the same people behind SEL and the IDGs are in the same networks with the people that are involved in the initiatives described below, many of them through the Evolutionary Leaders' 21 Synergy Circles that have infiltrated every cultural center of our society. All initiatives are essentially designed to bring people exposed to these brainwashing sessions around to the idea that our well-being as collective, global citizens matters more than individual rights and freedoms and that the former should be sacrificed for “the common good.” (A.K.A. socialism/communism). I’ve done a longer video here about how this group, The Evolutionary Leaders, headed up by heavy hitters like Deepak Chopra, former spiritual advisor to Hillary Clinton Jean Houston, and recent two-time presidential candidate Marianne Williamson have been able to push these ideologies from a religion called New Thought into the mainstream through their constant exposure on Oprah Winfrey’s popular television show.

Considering New Thought was recognized as a world religion by the Parliament of World Religions in 2015, (proof that has been worm-holed here) and that this religion they are promoting has been secretly installed as a state-sanctioned religion, this is a 1st amendment violation of our freedom of religion. This might be the most effective way to dismantle the teaching of critical queer, race, and environmental theory in the public sphere, because all of it stems from this religious, “all is one” worldview. I and other mothers and fathers from various states have been gathering evidence about the literal coordinated conspiracy to push these New Age occult beliefs into schools through the mechanism of Regional Educational Laboratories whose representatives were trained by the National Training Laboratories, and then using those people to push particular policies down to the state and local levels. It’s even documented in books like Networking, and The Aquarian Conspiracy on how these New Age groups, sometimes hidden under the pretext of peace or interfaith education, worked across states and countries to coordinate their efforts. There is TONS of source evidence, like these archived documents from The Fetzer Institute (who birthed the whole field of social emotional learning and the org that put it into schools – CASEL – to “bring about the Age of the Archangel Michael”) that we’ve discovered and have been compiling and cataloguing to build a case and perhaps file suit.

Section 3: The U.S-U.N. Education Conspiracy (UNESCO’s Education for All conferences), and the FRESH Partnership behind “Whole Child Education”

There is solid proof that the changes in education that have been pushing this one world religion from the United Nations came from a close coordination between the U.S. government and UNESCO through their Education for All conferences in 1990 and 2000, the formation of the FRESH partnership that came out of that second conference, and how those partners are now behind the WSCC model (covered above) today. You’ll see in that last hyperlink that The Learning Policy Institute and American Institutes of Research are listed as FRESH partners and they are two of the major players involved in the Whole Child Design Principles covered above. They are also spearheading something called the SoLD (Science of Learning and Development) Alliance, which is a spinoff group of GSoLEN, the Global Science of Learning Education Network, another recent global conspiracy to push the United Nations SDG 4 targets onto schools everywhere. There is reason to believe, based on this video clip, that AERA, the American Education Research Association, which promotes the dissemination and practical application of education research results, has been compromised to skew the way they gather and interpret research (see thread) to provide a fake evidence base for particular policies that further these agendas.

Section 4: The “Resilience” Agenda

Those who do not succumb to the above-described brainwashing programs must be forcibly led to participate in actions that further the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal agenda in other ways. Since our market economy allows the public to make decisions with their money that prop up our fossil fuel industry and influence the free market, the United Nations concurrent strategy to radically change America is to:

·         destroy capitalism/degrowth (while also dethroning the U.S. dollar as the world’s currency)

·         change how all countries measure progress away from Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to more subjective indicators of growth

·         shift all economies to deceptively termed “well-being (also called care) economies” (essentially, communism with a “little c,” or communofascism which will be outsourced to non-governmental “partners” through unconstitutional public-private partnerships)

·         install a surveillance ecosystem similar to China’s to track people’s “well-being,” the huge amounts of data from which will be stored in statewide databases connected to one’s digital I.D. Where they eventually want to go with this is a social credit system that (also like in China) forces citizens to engage in behavior that supports the UN’s goals.

The Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (ELTRR) A.K.A. WHO Geneva Charter for Well-Being

This shift to a well-being economy in America is currently being implemented through a treasonous 40+ interagency workgroup through the Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (a.k.a. “The Federal Plan” or “ELTRR”) and their partners in the Well Being in the Nation (WIN) Network. The 100+ civil society partners in the WIN Network put out a document Thriving Together Springboard in 2020, which they intentionally planned the Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience—published in 2022—to be based on. The Federal Plan’s role was to supposedly infuse federal funding into communities hit hard by the pandemic to help them recover as well as make them more “resilient” against future disasters via grants given through the six Federal Economic Development Administration (EDA) programs that funnel money from omnibus pandemic relief spending packages like ARPA or the CARES Act to their grantees. Under this pretext, radical policy changes (see its 78 recommendations) will be expected in the local economies that take this money to foster what programs like the Build Back Better Regional Challenge and EDA’s other programs have redefined “resilience” to be; changes not just in health, but in education, housing, employment,  transportation, food, water, justice, climate, etc. (a.k.a. the Social Determinants of Health/socialist policies). Essentially, The Federal Plan and its Vital Conditions Framework are being used as a “backdoor” way of implementing the totalitarian targets of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by secretly adopting the WHO’s Geneva Charter for Well-Being in the U.S. without a vote of the people. 

This scheme makes it the most obvious and easy area that any legislator or attorney general could push back on, especially because the “equity lens” they are admittedly using to distribute funding through this program is determined by skin color, which is a clear violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Additionally, like Senators Shelley Capito & Pete Ricketts recently pointed out that Inflation Reduction Act funding distributed through EPA grants earmarked to help solve climate change are actually going to radical anti-American NGOs, THE SAME THING is happening through the omnibus relief package funds (CARES, ARPA, etc.) distributed to organizations through the Economic Development Administration (EDA)’s 6 grant-giving programs. How? A good example of this is how I exposed in this news segment that CARES grant money was being misused by the Utah Multicultural Association to hire local political groups to indoctrinate Utah educators into queer theory. Chances are, funding that was earmarked for COVID recovery was improperly used like this in every state, simply because it all fell under creating conditions for recovery and resilience. In this instance, “recovery and resilience” was reinterpreted to mean something like “transgender and/or kids of color need a safe and welcoming environment to recover from the pandemic,” so therefore educators need to be trained in critical race and queer theory, and then this could be used as justification for utilizing the grant money to hire a DEI specialist. Similarly, “resilience”/”health” in the Federal Plan for ELTRR has been redefined to include the social determinants of health, which means it touches every sector. “Health” can then be used as a lever to change ALL policies, as the NGOs that receive the grant money are the ones willing to implement the 78 recommendations the federal government has attached to it that will help them make everything in their cities – transportation systems, housing, education, environmental policy, agriculture and other systems – transformed (or prepped) to make the shift to this well-being economy. The recommendations will effect what children will be taught in school (i.e. teach them to think like a communist – valuing collectivism over individualism), how communities are planned and budgeted (giving preferential treatment based on skin color), how much water can be used and what kind of food can be purchased (decided by equity and sustainability), and more. To find out what grant distributing entities in every state received money from the EDA’s programs, visit this link, and then further digging will be needed to identify which groups these funds were distributed to and exactly what they used them for.

The Federal Plan requires data collection and a new database of indicators to choose from (the WIN Measurement Framework) to measure each of the social determinants of health as a way to ensure there is "EQUITABLE" recovery and resilience. Subjective indicators like someone's perceived idea of everyday racism (start listening at this time stamp to 38:15) will be included in the data set for measuring health and well-being. The data will, of course, be disaggregating by race and any disparities in outcomes will be used to justify giving more resources to "underserved" and "historically marginalized" communities to level the playing field. The accountability mechanisms that follow the funding will require it. This is also transforming how cities and states are conducting their state and city health assessments and in turn their state and city health plans. In this video’s time stamp to 20:09, you’ll hear the Healthy Cities Delaware representative mention that their state has included measurements in the Vital Conditions framework to be in line with the Federal Plan. Since it is covers such a broad swath of areas, measuring “resilience” as an indicator of health will actually require collecting INVASIVE AMOUNTS OF DATA on children, adults, businesses, and other entities, and this large infusion of federal funding into cities and towns will actually give them the ability they didn’t have prior (in the name of accountability) to set up a surveillance ecosystem like China’s (databases, dashboards, cameras, etc.), gearing up for a social credit system to come. They’re planning on that data to be gathered and tracked through various “well-being” indices, and scored/ranked through entities like the Opportunity Index and Just Capital. This sets up a system where entities can be judged based upon whether or not their behavior is contributing to the “resilience” or “health” of their community. Watch the whole video I’ve made on YouTube discussing the Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience to get a good overview on all the issues with it, who's involved, how it operates, etc. I've also written more about it in the one-pager I did, this article I wrote for the Liberty Sentinel, as well as this X thread, which has links to supporting evidence and information on the people, agencies and methodology involved. The program American Journal found my thread on X and covered it in this segment as well.

As I mentioned, getting cities and towns to adopt the imperative to measure resilience through the ELTRR preemptively creates an infrastructure (through the influx of omnibus spending packages) for control of society before a disaster even hits. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE I’VE LEARNED WHAT THE UNITED NATIONS NEXT SET OF DEVELOPMENT GOALS WILL BE AFTER THEIR 2030 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS. The SDGs for 2030-2050 have already been created and are going to be called the (Climate) Resilience Development Goals; and they have plans to have the Regenerative Development Goals follow that. Similar to how the World Health Organization (WHO) through their Pandemic Treaty and the UN through their Pact for the Future were trying to elect themselves to have great power over nations’ actions in response to global disasters (real or otherwise), the Resilience Development Goals are on track to do the same for ANY DISASTER in ANY COUNTRY. In the U.S. FEMA IS ALREADY LAYING THE GROUNDWORK FOR THIS PLAN through their National Resilience Guidance, which I warn about in this X Thread. Similar to the ELTRR, it will transform communities by requiring all sorts of (communist) changes (and reporting on those changes) in the name of “preparing for global shocks” when they apply for and accept their Resilience Grants. FEMA has established metrics to monitor progress in resilience that will redefine the conditions to be ready for emergencies by advocating for things like smart/15-minute cities, “resilient” (well-being) economies, resilient (“equitable”, not equal) societies, “resilient” people (by collecting mass amounts of data on their “well-being”), and environmental justice. See this hyperlink and scroll down to see that their grant program BRICS—Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities—is just one of several federal agency programs participating in Justice40 (mentioned below—linked to both the Federal Plan and Climate Corps) that prioritize federal investments to benefit communities that they deem as “disadvantaged” or “underserved” (so, in other words, based on race—another Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 violation). They say “resilience requires aspiring to eliminate disparities by focusing resources on communities that have been historically marginalized or disadvantaged.” If you read between the lines of this nice language, what they are really saying here is that wealth and resources will need to be redistributed (A.K.A. communism) to be resilient against emergencies.  I imagine the UN’s Resilient Development Goals will behave in the same way. The UN will have to “create the conditions for resilience,” which will mean total control over all aspects of nation states (goodbye, national sovereignty) under the narrative that risks against future disasters can be mitigated if there is global coordination. Additionally, FEMA is partnering with local communities to create “resilience hubs” that can be used as a critical facility during disasters. These hubs will be places that provide food and water distribution, shelter, charging, cooling, and disaster response coordination. During non-disaster times, these facilities can serve as community buildings for gathering and recreation. While I think that these hubs are actually a great idea during disasters, I highly suspect that this initiative might also be a roundabout way for them to create spaces that can serve as community schools (described above), since they are receiving huge criticisms and backlash from communities who don’t want their local schools turning into medical facilities that they know are planning to usurp their parental rights.

Section 5: ESG and the Social Credit System to Come

The UN Global Compact/Standards of Conduct for Business, the Collaborative Initiatives of Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) and the Web of Reporting Mechanisms that Operate like a Cartel, Locking Businesses into “Woke” Policies

Introduction to ESG (Environmental Social & Governance) scoring: ESG was originally cooked up through a collaboration between the United Nations, Business, and Financial sectors in 2009 in an effort to “create a world economy” that would further the UN Sustainable Development Goals.  You can listen to Ban Ki Moon, former Secretary General of the UN explain it in this video. As part of this push, the United Nations Global Compact, Principles for Responsible Investment, UNEP-FI & UNCTAD created the Sustainable Stock Exchange (SSE) initiative to create a coalition of capital markets that “align with the Sustainable Development Goals.” Some of the Sustainable Stock Exchange partners included were the U.S.’s NASDAQ, NYSE, CME and others. The stock exchange then became another regulatory body that enforces UN Standards, as companies were then forced to report on ESG measures to them. Concurrently, companies who have signed onto the Global Compact are encouraged to operate “responsibly” in the areas of human rights, labor, the environment, and corruption. It’s based on 10 principles that companies commit to uphold, based on established UN Documents. Companies participating in the Global Compact are expected to align their strategies and operations with these principles and to take actions that contribute to broader societal goals, including the Sustainable Development Goals, and as such are required to submit a Communication of Progress to show that they did so every year. These are just a few of many initiatives holding businesses to practices that further the UN’s 2030 Agenda.

As I explained in this article I did for Jennifer Bilek’s 11th Hour Blog, another way ESG is being pushed is through Collaborative Initiatives, like those housed at consultancy groups like Business for Social Responsibility (BSR). An example of one such collaborative is the PGLE, or Partnership for Global LGBTIQ+ Equality, which is a coalition of 29 organizations committed to leveraging their individual and collective advocacy to accelerate LGBTIQ+ equality and inclusion in the workplace globally and in the communities in which they operate. In discussing its formation at the BSR19 Conference, former head of Ernst & Young, Beth A. Brooke-Marciniak said that a few years back she and some other businesses involved in forming PGLE had a private meeting at Davos with (at the time) Vice President Joe Biden to discuss their role in pushing this agenda. According to her, Biden sat down with these companies, looked them in the eye and said, “You companies can do what we – government – cannot, and will never do. You have to change the world on this issue.” Heeding his words, that same group of companies supported by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and operating in direct collaboration with the World Economic Forum (WEF), launched PGLE in 2019.

Because their combined wealth exceeds that of most countries, the 14 companies that started the PGLE and the ones that have joined since are able to use their financial prowess as a powerful tool to:

·         advance the LGBTIQ+ agenda by working together to “operationalize the United Nations Standards of Conduct for Business” produced in 2017 in collaboration with the Institute for Human Rights and Business. PGLE’s role is to provide tools and resources for the 400+ companies that have signed onto the UN Standards of Conduct to self-assess how they’re doing in combating discrimination against LGBTQI+ persons through scoring systems that identify gaps in their implementation of the 5 standards.

·         recommend, based on the information provided through their tools, how to close the identified gaps that exist in their implementation of the UN’s 5 Standards by strengthening policies, processes, and methodologies to support LGBTQI+ inclusivity. That may mean encouraging businesses to proudly feature a transgender person in their marketing, carrying clothing on their website or storefront that supports transgenderism, or changing their governance practices to allow men who believe that they are women into restrooms and changing spaces meant for actual women.

While the use of these tools and the metrics that come out of them are supposedly voluntary to participate in, it can be used as a leg up to benefit businesses that choose to offer them up to activists and investors who use ESG (Environmentalism, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance) scoring to determine which businesses deserve to receive capital based upon how dedicated they are to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It can also disadvantage those who don’t or those who receive a poor report from these tools. This type of reporting has become so normalized that one could argue many businesses are being forced against their will into adopting and measuring policies and practices that cater to the Sustainable Development Goals because the banks and investors they do businesses with that are participating in this racket are behaving like a cartel, threatening to withhold capital from businesses if their ESG score isn’t up to snuff. The PGLE and the other initiatives housed in the BSR are strong-arming companies into joining these coalitions, as those who don’t struggle to keep up with the competition and are costed out of business. Listen to the president of Bank of America describe in this video how this ESG cartel and the metrics that come out of it all stem from the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The rest of the thread covers how the collection of metrics through ESG relates to being able to measure & track social emotional skills (covered above) and is seen as essential to developing “characteristics, personalities & behaviours required to preserve human capital in an AI-dominated future" where "work will pair computer intelligence with humans' (appropriate) SEL skills." As I explained in my speech at the UN (when I was invited there in 2023 to speak by a group of pro-family NGOs), this can only lead to the social engineering of humans, and the interruption of families being able to pass on their beliefs to their children. This, though, is exactly what the United Nations needs to accomplish their totalitarian agenda to help humans reach the global consciousness needed to make the evolutionary leap to “humanity” and save our species (a la group selection, not natural selection).

***Side note on ESG: The banks and investors participating in this know it is not profitable. The organizations who are pushing this, like the Club of Rome KNOW THIS too, and OPENLY ADMIT IT in this video. This stakeholder capitalism is very clearly ignoring the fiduciary responsibility that businesses have to their shareholders. They’re having to invent all kinds of new ways to repackage ESG to cheat people to put their money into these initiatives that are destined to fail. One way is to rename it. Climate-related financial disclosures will now be called nature-related financial disclosures and recommendations and guidance for that will be spearheaded by TNFD. The Accountability Accelerator is also being set up by the WEF to administer carrots and sticks and to make sure there is a web/network of accountability actors holding people in the private sector to these commitments. As there will not be enough money for all countries to make their commitments to the UN SDGs, Jorgen Randers offers the Club of Rome’s proposal from their Earth4All report, which is to establish a new international monetary authority and have them just PRINT MONEY and give it to the poor (and not make it seem like that’s what they are doing). Based on what I’ve already shared with you, you probably won’t be surprised that the next step in ESG will be having to report on “resilience,” and to make a lack of resilience—or what they say it is—an insurance risk. The World Economic Forum, who signed a Strategic Partnership Framework with the United Nations to jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, has already proclaimed that an “R” for Resilience is the missing letter (metric) to ESG.

DATA/DATA COLLECTION AS A MEANS OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING AND SOCIAL CONTROL

ESG + SEL=Social Credit System based on the UN SDGs: As noted above, the UN openly admits in this document that Social Emotional Learning (SEL) taught in K-12 schools is necessary to advance their sustainable development agenda and to get students to be global citizens that become activists for the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. While some mistakenly believe that SEL is a salve to the mental health crisis our youth are experiencing, it’s being used as a tool to brainwash our youth into adopting a critical consciousness that values collectivism over individualism by manipulating students’ innate sense of empathy. They’re taught that certain aspects of their identity and the way that America’s systems and institutions are set up gives some power and privilege while others are oppressed and marginalized, and that they way to show empathy is to become a social justice warrior who actively works to tear down America’s systems and institutions which hold these dynamics into place. I’ve written a brief article covering this document here. Essentially this is creating a generation of youth similar to the “Red Guard” during the Cultural Revolution in China or the Hitler youth in Germany during WWII that sought to destroy the country’s customs and its culture, and would even turn against their parents if they disagreed with the regime. The scariest part about social emotional learning is that they are collecting data on students’ values, attitudes and beliefs and giving them a score through dashboards like that from Panorama Education. Who gets to define what a subjective skill like “empathy” looks like? What does it mean to practice “perspective-taking” the “right” way? Does this mean doing what Second Step defines as the Golden Rule, instead of the actual Golden Rule, which requires that students sacrifice their beliefs to “consider how someone wants to be treated and then treat them that way?” This data collection and profiling is setting up our children to have a social credit score in the future. In fact, the scores they receive now are stored in the statewide longitudinal data system and follow them (along with their academic scores) from preschool through age 20 and into the workforce. Companies like The Dahill Group, who are planning to hire based on ESG-centered goals will discriminate against candidates based on their “emotional intelligence,” or lack thereof, reflected in their poor SEL scores if they resist the indoctrination. The post-secondary readiness requirement of the 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act that students get instruction in what the workforce requires, coupled with the ESG reporting mechanisms the banks and investor cartels are demanding of the workforce based around the UN Sustainable Development Goals, sets up an imperative for students to be taught subject matter that inculcates them with the social emotional skills that must be adopted in order to want to accomplish the UN SDGs. To start dismantling this school to activist pipeline, ESG through its RICO violations, SEL through its Constitutional violations, and/or the repealing of the Every Student Succeeds Act will need to occur. To learn more about this subject, you can read this article I wrote for the Ohio Press Network, and this article on my Substack which covers the major changes in College and Career Readiness Competencies by the National Association of Colleges and Employers and the American School Counseling Association (ASCA) that make it so that teaching students woke ideologies in K-12 education is a necessity.

Section 6: Americorps and the Better Together America Ecosystem

Another area that’s blatantly being used for the UN’s influence is our nation’s volunteer service program, Americorps, and massive amounts of tax-payer funding is supporting it. The President’s Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 provides $1.342 billion for AmeriCorps, which also includes funding for the American Climate Corps Hub (mentioned below), with $8 billion in mandatory funding to support an additional 50,000 American Climate Corps members annually by 2031. In preparation for serving in leftist assignments like identifying Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) groups and their status within area schools to curate a resource database for youth or creating DEI youth training videos for “family planning” centers, new recruits are brought through leadership training programs that introduces them to critical (racial and gender/queer) theories and social justice activism by inducing in them what’s called a critical consciousness that values collectivism over individualism. 

These training programs and retreats are a conduit to brainwash future service members into thinking America and its systems & institutions are designed to oppress certain groups and that they should become change agents to do what they can before, during and after their service (as they are funneled into jobs through their networks) to tear down America’s systems and institutions in favor of a more “equitable,” socialist/communist system. Considering many of these service members also helping to teach refugees coming into this country through the R.I.S.E. Americorps program, I have reason to believe this is also being used as a way to radicalize immigrants coming into our country. Additionally, I also have grave concerns about how these service members are being vetted, as this article documents how a recently homeless person with self-described emotional problems was trained by City Year, and then sent into the schools where they are affirming students’ queer identities. Americorps is setting up a fast-track for individuals like these to become teachers to address the shortage through their Student Success Coach program. I’ve written an article about this, which mirrors the one-pager I’ve done on the topic.

This wouldn’t be the first time Americorps has been accused of breaking federal law.  In 2016, it was found that government-funded service members of the youth job-training program doing what was classified as “doula care” were actually helping transport pregnant women to abortion clinics and providing them with emotional support during their procedures for three clinics which the National Association of Community Health Centers—who operate as part of AmeriCorps' health branch—contract with in New York City.

With the addition of the newly established Climate Corps Hub of Americorps by Executive Order to “train the next generation of conservation and climate leaders,” job training and service opportunities will also now be provided on a wide range of projects that are aimed at tackling climate change. Climate Corps is yet another back door to accomplish the targets of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal agenda in America. Recruits to this specific program will be brainwashed into critical environmental theories on top of the other critical theories Americorps members are learning, and will create future leaders who demand a departure from using fossil fuels for energy and future jobs to make that happen. This initiative is connected to the Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (which I detailed above) through its Justice40 arm, focusing on “climate resilience” through “equity and environmental justice” – prioritizing communities and projects that help meet the Administration’s Justice40 goals.

Americorps is also connected to the Better Together America Ecosystem, which is a network of radical agents that want to make America "better" by subverting our Constitution, changing our economy, and doing away with the electoral college, some of whom I've already mentioned above. It includes Evolutionary Leaders (WISE SAGES), people from the Federal Plan for ELTRR, and supposed initiatives to increase "civic dialogue" to "save our democracy" like the New Pluralists, and Braver Angels that have created an extremely deceiving front for what they are really up to. I reveal in this article I wrote for the Ohio Press Network how the narrative behind "saving our democracy" by addressing what they say is hate-fueled violence in America and the group of "bipartisan" former White House Domestic Policy Council members formed by the Biden administration to tackle it, Dignity.us, is really more interested in election reform and indoctrinating students than uniting the country. Of the four members of Dignity.us, 3 of them-Melody Barnes, John Bridgeland and Joe Grogan-all serve on the National Advisory Council of the COVID-Collaborative, one of three non-profit organizations owned by Timothy Shriver (who is also the board chair of the org that sets the standards for social emotional learning programs-CASEL and the leader of the organization of UNITE, which is a part of the New Pluralists). This video shows how all three of his organizations work together to not only push critical theory and social justice activism into states’ education systems through mental health initiatives like social emotional learning and action civics, but states’ adoption of Ranked Choice Voting policies as well. The final team member, Cecilia Munoz, is a senior advisor and former vice president of New America, a Soros-funded organization behind both the U.S. Department of Education’s blockchain education pilots and blockchain-based pilots for Ranked Choice Voting. See this X thread for more information on how Dignity.us and the New Pluralists are really just front groups for pushing policies at the federal, state and local levels that benefit Democrats in the name of “democracy," like censoring speech through Tim Shriver's Dignity Index, which is what the Dignity.us website has literally turned into or using disaggregated data they collect about groups' "civic capacity" to take lands out of productive use (similar to what Natural Asset Companies were trying to do).

Section 7: THE END GOAL-A Digital ID on the Blockchain and Interconnected Systems of Data

Really, the goal is to get ALL DATA ABOUT CITIZENS—civic, health, SEL skills, academics, birth, death and vaccine certificates, etc.—on a digital wallet that we have to use to get around and participate in society. Listen to this World Bank Blockchain in Education Working Group describe in this video how people skills will be machine-readable data that can be held & controlled from a digital wallet app & exchanged like currency for learning & employment (or loan) opportunities. I explain the Internet of Education and the whole ecosystem of players that are working hard to make this come true, led by the White House, UNESCO, and the Learning Economy Foundation (among others) in this longer video on my YouTube channel. They say they are working with partners like LEGO to solve United Nations SDG 4—Quality and Inclusive Education for All, which they’ll do by making all education digital (and require it to be lifelong), make the credentials you achieve from education digital, and then linking it to business, the workforce, and more.  It will be the perfect scenario for a social credit system.

Section 8: Possible Solutions

Really, all of the initiatives I’ve described above hinge on the collection, scoring and tracking of personal and societal data. By removing the data collection and protecting the people from it in policy, the cabal of people and organizations orchestrating the social credit system to come will be literally starved to death. It’s way past time for something like a Data Privacy Bill of Rights.

It’s also time we start talking about (and doing away with) all of these public-private partnerships. They behave as an unelected, unaccountable other form of government that has been steering America away from national sovereignty and toward the objectives of the United Nations. If anything, these agreements should warrant crystal clear transparency with the public, but they are often muddied and riddled with corruption. A return to more local control in general is one of our most effective protection mechanisms against global overreach, whether that be manufacturing, technology, or otherwise.

In addition, many tax-exempt organizations that have worked with our government, like the Carnegie Institute, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (just to name a few) are involved in the initiatives I described above and provide valuable funding to either get them off the ground, bolster their implementation or lobby passage of laws in Washington to cement their usage. Perhaps we need to revisit and expand on the investigation that was began by the Reece Committee in 1954, who researched educational and philanthropic foundations which were exempt from federal taxation and found out that they were using their resources for purposes that were un-American and subversive. They put out a report detailing their findings that called for an even more detailed investigation. Their report states, “Those foundations which are concerned with internationalism along political lines appear to center their activities around projects which support the Government policy of participation in United Nations activities.” Even way back then, members of the committee had discovered that since about 1945, these foundations were secretly using their philanthropy to help along the creation of a worldwide collectivist state in cahoots with the Soviet Union to affect a change in America’s form of government. You can listen to Norman Dodd, the staff director/director of research to that committee, explain in this rare interview (listen to timestamp 14:54) what they had found when they searched the minutes of the Carnegie Foundation. He and his team educated the Reece Committee as to the ways that Carnegie and other endowed foundations’ activities to get control over the content of American education largely affected the country as a whole, especially their effort to “orient our (the US’s) educational system away from support of the principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence and implemented in the Constitution.” Looking at our education system today, they’ve been largely successful in this endeavor.  Opening up a new investigation seems to be warranted.

I am just one of many voices screaming into the void, and while we can raise awareness of certain issues for subsets of people (if the algorithm and shadow banners let us), only those that make the laws have power to fix any of the problems I’ve described above. If you are a legislator reading this, please do something…anything. Federal or state legislation that stems or stops the advances being made in the areas I’ve shared in this document is a good start. The American people are counting on you. If you are a citizen reading this, get involved and help out in whatever big or small way you are able. Start by sharing this document with your elected officials.

Time is running out. America is the last stop for freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and our Constitution and Bill of Rights stand in the globalists’ way of totalitarian control. If we fail in protecting the U.S.’s national sovereignty, we will, as President Ronald Raegan said, “spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it once was like in the United States where men were free.”